We HAVEN’T yet fully answered the coffee and cream question: a follow up post will be coming soon!

So, I’m teaching a new course, Math 2033, Mathematical Thought, and it’s going great! I’d like to take a moment to write about it!

(This is one reason the MF has been kinda slow lately; another is that I’m chair) When it’s fully up and running, we’ll have about 150 students in one large section each semester (we’re starting with about 100). In a nutshell, it’s the Math Factor, as a course.

So, the list of topics is pretty familiar; from the podcast you are pretty well acquainted with the kinds of things I like to share: game theory, encryption, a little number theory, theory of computation & godel’s theorem, cardinality/infinity; plus more visual hands on things like topology, graph theory, symmetry, four-dimensional geometry, and so forth, and some baby programming in a playground IDE (scratch.mit.edu)

The real thing though is that my co-teacher and I have taken a kind of radical approach to the structure of the course—and our crazy ideas are working out great! In a nutshell, the students are guaranteed a C just for showing up and doing what they’re told (more on that in a sec), but to get an A, they have to become active collaborators in the building of the course, adding to the long-term infrastructure. I didn’t expect to give out very many A’s at all, but a surprising number of students seem up to the challenge. Part of the point is that this reward structure aligns the interests of the course directly with the interest of the students. Another nice thing is that it is much more like the reward structure of Real Life, far more so than most academic experiences: you can coast and do ok, but to really succeed, initiative and imagination are required. Interestingly, 20% of the class can’t even rise to the minimal standard of showing up, and will fail. 

Another nice thing is that students can bring to bear any of their own interests and abilities; we need such a wide range of things done—photography, writing, editing, leaders on our discussion board, organizers, all kinds of stuff. It is in fact possible to get an A by dragooning other students into harvesting, trimming and delivering a huge load of bamboo for some math sculptures the class will be making soon. The fact is, I have large ambitions for this, and no way to do more than a fraction of the work; students that help bring this off will be the ones that get an A.

SO, how does it actually work? The basic daily rhythm is that we give a lecture, usually with some sort of hands-on fun and games component. We then post a prompt or two on the class discussion board (hidden to the outside world). The students have 24 hours to post, and then another 24 hours to comment on each others ideas. This is the real heart of the course and the activity has steadily grown, reaching 1700 posts a couple of weeks ago. Wow!  (I shouldn’t exaggerate this though: some are really into it, many are trying to get by with as little as possible. I am aiming for a culture where slacking is gently disgraced, and we’re on track to get there)

As you can guess, this has completely lifted out of my ability to monitor; we have a number of ways this is digested and managed. For example, about half a dozen of the more thoughtful students are responsible for reading all of posts and trying to raise the level of discourse, and for creating useful summaries of the best ideas.

BUT that’s just the “internal” part of the course. Externally, open to the world, is a wiki, math2033.uark.edu which is going pretty well. I view this as a multi-year project, so this is a pretty good start. Most of what you see there is the product of about twenty students, and a few really do A LOT of work, including having developed the basic organizational framework. (So they get A’s for sure)

I’ve been spending a lot of time developing solid materials for use in the course, such as this sample handout, on the Halting Problem.

The students seem pretty pumped. It’s working!!! 

(We passed an important milestone last week; several students told me they ended up fooling around way too much with one of the optional assignments, messing them up in other classes! Perfect!)

We first pose a quick question: If you drive fifty miles in fifty minutes, must there be some ten minute interval in which you drive exactly ten miles?

Of course there must — mustn’t there? Well prove it!

Our main feature this week is an interview with Michael Breen, from the American Mathematical Society, who came and hosted a game show “Who Wants To Be A Mathematician!” About a hundred high school students from all over northwest Arkansas came to cheer on their classmates; Kyle Strong of Har-Ber High in Springdale came in first, winning $1250, and Karan Batra, of Bentonville placed second with $250.

Our interview includes a few sample problems… I guess we shouldn’t list too many of them, in case Micheal wants to recycle them! Mike’s also responsible for the great series of Mathematical Moments posters— check them out!

PS: We opened with the Up To One Million Dollars In Prize Money May Be Given Away gag… Always fun!

On April 29, 2004, we did a piece on the very first Bamboopalooza; (the segment BG. Bamboopalooza was a couple of years later) and Jenn Starr asks about the sequence 1 3 7 12 18 26 35 … 

(Incidentally, once you unlock the secret of the sequence, can you determine how fast, asymptotically, it will grow?)

Now, really, tell me, what good is a podcast if you can’t promote your beautiful new book?

We are very very pleased to announce the publication of The Symmetries of Things, a comprehensive, modern account of the mathematics of symmetry, complete with over 1000 illustrations!

Send us your favorite paradoxes of this kind and we’ll report back on April 15.