Comments on: CS. Perfect Sums http://mathfactor.uark.edu/2007/08/cs-perfect-sums/ The Math Factor Podcast Site Fri, 08 Aug 2014 12:52:06 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=4.9.25 By: foley http://mathfactor.uark.edu/2007/08/cs-perfect-sums/comment-page-1/#comment-110 Mon, 13 Aug 2007 18:21:42 +0000 http://mathfactor.uark.edu/2007/08/07/cs-perfect-sums/#comment-110 How about Coincident times.
Any hand position on the clock may or may not have a coincident time or may be a coincident time. At any ambiguous moment the hand position also represents that moment and its coincident time.
12:00:00 and the other 10 aligned times do not have coincident times since the hands are aligned on each other.

]]> By: nklein http://mathfactor.uark.edu/2007/08/cs-perfect-sums/comment-page-1/#comment-109 Thu, 09 Aug 2007 21:28:15 +0000 http://mathfactor.uark.edu/2007/08/07/cs-perfect-sums/#comment-109 I like ambichronic… but I’m also partial to handbivalent.

]]> By: georgelu61 http://mathfactor.uark.edu/2007/08/cs-perfect-sums/comment-page-1/#comment-108 Wed, 08 Aug 2007 05:15:43 +0000 http://mathfactor.uark.edu/2007/08/07/cs-perfect-sums/#comment-108 I believe 36 is the lowest possible solution

4, 9, 2, 3, 18 works : )

btw

i thought of two decent names for the ambiguous times-

ambichronic, from an etymological standpoint a good choice

but isochronic has a nice ring to it :)

]]>